The acting director of the board of examination and assessment, Arjun Ghatule, defended the university. "The university collects crores from re-evaluation applications and must not be able to get away with it," he added.
Until that is done, there will be no onus on examiners to ensure there isn't a mistake during evaluation." He has also demanded that the university return the revaluation fees to students who are failed wrongly.
All of these things put students through great agony and hence paper checkers must be made accountable.
Also, several times, revaluation results come much after students take the supplementary examinations. The committee must submit its report to the vice-chancellor, who can instruct the authorities to take disciplinary action.ĭurve said, "A student's career depends on the marks they score during their years at the university. According to section 48 of the act, the board of examinations and evaluation shall constitute a committee of not more than five persons to investigate and take disciplinary action for malpractice or lapses on the part of candidates, paper-setters, examiners, moderators, referees and teachers who are connected with the conduct of the examination. The RTI application, filed by activist Vihar Durve, has also revealed that there is a provision for action against erring evaluators in the Maharashtra Public University Act, 2016. In March 2017, TOI reported that between 20, 73,000 students were wrongly failed in examinations but cleared the red after they filed for revaluation.
An RTI query has revealed that the university, between 20, did not take any action against defaulting evaluators for failing students, who were found to pass after applying for re-evaluation. MUMBAI: While a large number of Mumbai University students are erroneously failed each year, requiring them to apply for re-evaluation, no action seems to be initiated against paper checkers.
0 kommentar(er)
